🔗 Share this article

Tbecame clear he endured a loss to Grimsby. He weathered losing a crucial continental showpiece against a particularly poor Spurs sides for many years. He withstood home defeats to domestic rivals, a lowly league position, his rigid approach, squandering some of the club’s best academy products, the 32% win rate, labeling the squad the poorest the club has ever seen. But there was a single opponent with whom Ruben Amorim would not be allowed to dance. If you challenge the sporting director, and you best not miss.

Regrettably, similar to numerous Premiership defender in Blackburn’s title-winning 1994-95 season, the coach took on the executive and appears to have missed. The most distracted of readers can see the irony here: a manager who frequently berated his squad for failing in individual battles crumbling when confronted by the white heat and formidable presence of a the Premier League’s most intimidating sporting directors.

In truth, this whole bruising episode appears to portray the director in a whole new light. Perhaps it might have been easy, given his nine months in a similar role at Southampton, to regard Jason Wilcox as merely a functionary within the club's structure: a man who owed his position as much to his close relationship with ex-colleague a fellow executive as any verifiable talent. How mistaken everyone was. By masterfully outmanoeuvring United’s feted head coach, just as he bested the unfortunate a previous executive before him, he has proved himself to be among football's strategic masterminds: a tactical intellect of which the club's competitors will now be rightly wary.

The Strategic Clash Over Formation and Philosophy

For example, it was Jason Wilcox , after being involved in the leadership that hired the rigid 3-4-3 advocate the coach originally, played a key role in trying to persuade Amorim to ditch his beloved formation. Unsurprisingly, these entreaties were resisted. However, such directives carry more weight when issued from the mouth of a man the impeccable soccer background of Jason Wilcox, holder of three England caps and a contributor to a championship team from 31 years ago.

Perhaps in time he may be persuaded to explain his reasoning to the rest of us. Maybe one day he might be asked why Amorim is departing with full compensation, without any penalty clause in place. But Jason Wilcox seldom speaks publicly, for excellent reasons. The real thinkers in football – men like Jason Wilcox – function at a level beyond our own mundane comprehension. Were he to speak, most likely all we would hear is a series of ultrasonic blips and complex calculations. Wanting is not the same as being prepared to comprehend it.

The Ultimate Authority Behind Command

But of course, in training our focus on Jason Wilcox we overlook the true genius behind the club's current leadership. The director is, in reality, merely executing the directives of his ultimate line manager the billionaire owner, who privately has emphasized his preference for a four-man defense. It is reported, Ratcliffe has also suggested playing Bryan Mbeumo in a wing-back role. The owner is eager for United to adopt data science and analytics. Per reports, in an executive meeting soon after his investment, he announced that the team's approach of play “shall be decided in this room”.

After all, Ratcliffe is a specialist in this technical footballing stuff, leveraging his background in industry and sailing. Above all he is immensely wealthy, and it is known, the rich are the best of us: more perceptive, sagacious, more tactically astute, fundamentally superior. Who else could one trust to oversee a strategic plan of cost-cutting, the construction of a modern arena that appears a lot like an abstract design, the acquisition of Benjamin Sesko?

A New Football Hierarchy: Directors Over Coaches

This is a trend we are increasingly seeing in top-tier football. For decades, clubs foolishly entrusted big footballing decisions to low-level employees such as coaches, talent spotters – even footballers. Maybe previously possible for a young, innovative manager with ideas and drive to go into a club and see their vision supported to fruition. But how many businesses have such individuals set up? How many large-scale layoffs have they overseen? Far preferable to invest the real power where it belongs: the leadership tier, the open-necked shirt brigade, the individuals with impressive professional resumes. Better by far to decide the strategy by the directors and appoint someone who will adapt their methods to suit. If coaches were once chefs, they are now more akin to delivery personnel: not responsible for the product, but still finally accountable if it arrives cold or fails of the box.

In the meantime, a coach's role has become not about defining the vision and more about marketing it: the front-facing representative on the front desk, the visible figurehead for a club they have minimal power to influence. Enzo Maresca takes a squad of very young players into Europe and wins domestic cups, and effectively gets sacked for speaking out. A manager at Celtic finds his reputation ruined while the people who appointed him continue to make errors another day.

A Neoliberal Game: Responsibility for the Few

And perhaps in a small way this is simply neoliberalism at work: the rise of a gilded overclass who can never be wrong, whose choices remain sacrosanct, whose mistakes can always be sacked away without justification. Hire the system coach only to fire them for playing too much that system. Hire the process guy and then discard him for requiring too long. And most importantly show gratitude; for your modest increases in ticket costs, for your new player acquisitions, for the reality that the adults – regardless of their expertise – remain in control.